Kinetic evaluation and optimization of the drying process of 3D printed pasta
https://doi.org/10.36107/10.36107/spfp.2022.295
Abstract
Background of the study: Fused deposition modeling is the most commonly used 3D printing technology in the food industry. In this technology, the printing parameters and the structural-mechanical properties of the product to be printed play an important role in the quality of the final product.
Current knowledge gap to be filled and study objective: This study aimed to use the drying process as a tool to improve the quality of pasta 3D printing. The purpose of this work was to evaluate the influence of the regime parameters of the drying process and find their optimal values to ensure the quality of pasta obtained by 3D printing.
Materials and methods of research: The object of research in this work was pasta obtained as a result of 3D printing. For local heating of the extruded product, hot air drying and infrared heating are used. Response surface methodology was applied to optimize the drying process. The following were chosen as the main variables affecting the drying process: heating power, processing time and distance from the heating source. The maximum weight loss of the product, combined with the maximum temperature below 100 °C during the entire processing time, constitutes an optimization challenge.
Results and their application: Regression equations and response surfaces for hot air drying are obtained. With a processing time of 1.5 min, the value of the heating power is 2 units, and the distance from the substrate to the heating source is 1.77 cm. The noted values of the independent variables for the response function can be considered optimal. With these parameters, the substrate temperature is 140.6 °C, the maximum temperature in the center of the sample is 97.9 °C, and the sample mass loss is 17.7%. The results of the study can be adapted for food products with modified texture, depending on the post-processing conditions to which it is subjected.
About the Authors
Alexander N. Martekha
Russian State Agrarian University –
Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yuliya Eu. Kaverina
Russian State Agrarian University –
Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Blagoveshchensky, I. G., Shibanov, E. D., Zagorodnikov, K. A. (2020). Optimizaciya 3D-pechati na primere ispol`zovaniya shokoladnoj glazuri [Optimization of 3D print on the example of use of chocolate glaze]. Pishhevaya promy`shlennost` [Food Industry], 12, 70-73. https://doi.org/10.24411/0235-2486-2020-10147
2. Bredikhin, S. A., Antipov, S. T., Andreev, V. N., & Martekha, A. N. (2021a). Vliyanie reologicheskih harakteristik na kachestvo 3D-pechati pishchevyh past [Influence of rheological characteristics on the quality of 3D printing of food pastes]. Vestnik VGUIT [Proceedings of VSUET], 83(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2021-1-1-6
3. Bredikhin, S. A., Andreev, V. N., Martekha, A. N., & Berezovsky, Yu. M. (2021b). Korrelyaciya reologicheskih svojstv s kachestvom trekhmernoj pechati shokoladnoj massy [Correlation of rheological properties with quality three-dimensional printed chocolate mass]. Polzunovskij vestnik [Polzunovskij vestnik], 3, 111-116. https://doi.org/10.25712/ASTU.2072-8921.2021.03.015
4. Bredikhin, S. A., Andreev, V. N., Martekha, A. N., & Kaverina, Yu. E. (2021c). Optimizaciya trekhmernoj pechati hlebopekarnogo testa [Optimization of 3D printing of bakery dough]. Tekhnologiya i tovarovedenie innovacionnyh pishchevyh produktov [Technology and merchandising of innovative food products], 5(70), 39-42. https://doi.org/10.33979/2219-8466-2021-70-5-39-42
5. Grishin, A. S., Bredikhina, O. V., Pomoz, A. S., Ponomarev, V. G., & Krasulya, O. N. (2016). Novye tekhnologii v industrii pitaniya - 3D-pechat' [New technologies in the food industry - 3D printing]. Vestnik YUzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pishchevye i biotekhnologii [Bulletin of South Ural State University, Series Food and Biotechnology], 4(2), 36-44. https://doi.org/10.14529/food160205
6. Dresvyannikov, V. A., Strakhov, E. P., & Vozmishcheva, A. S. (2017). Analiz primeneniya additivnyh tekhnologij v pishchevoj promyshlennosti [Analysis of application of additive technologies in the food industry]. Prodovol'stvennaya politika i bezopasnost' [Food policy and security], 3, 133-139. https://doi.org/10.18334/ppib.4.3.38500
7. Pribytkov, A. V., Ovsyannikov, V. Yu., Martekha, A. N., & Toroptsev, V. V. (2015). Osnovnye faktory, vliyayushchie na kinetiku processa sushki fermentirovannogo pshenichnogo syr'ya [Analysis of the influence of the main factors on the kinetics of the process drying of raw fermented wheat vibroboiling pour in bed]. Hranenie i pererabotka sel'hozsyr'ya [Storage and processing of farm products], 5, С. 33-35.
8. Semenov, A. S., Maksimov, A. S., Besfamilnaya, E. M., & Talmazova, D. V. Tekhnologii 3D-pechati v pishchevoj promyshlennosti [3D printing technologies in the food industry]. Molodoj uchenyj [Young scientist], 21(363), 41-43.
9. Allan, M. C., Rajwa, B., & Mauer, L. J. (2018). Effects of sugars and sugar alcohols on the gelatinization temperature of wheat starch. Food Hydrocolloids, 84, 593-607. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FOODHYD.2018.06.035
10. Auger, F., Morel, M-H., Lefebvre, J., Dewilde, M., & Redl, A. A. (2008). Parametric and microstructural study of the formation of gluten network in mixed flour–water batter. Journal of Cereal Science, 48, 349-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCS.2007.10.006
11. Cappelli, A., Bettaccini, L., & Cini, E. (2020). The kneading process: A systematic review of the effects on dough rheology and resulting bread characteristics, including improvement strategies. Trends Food Science and Technology, 104, 91-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.08.008
12. Chhanwal, N., Bhushette, P.R., & Anandharamakrishnan, C. (2019). Current Perspectives on Nonconventional Heating Ovens for Baking Process: a Review. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 12, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-018-2198-y
13. Demei, K., Zhang, M., Phuhongsung, P., & Mujumdar, A. S. (2022). 3D Food printing: Controlling characteristics and improving technological effect during food processing. Food Research International, 111120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111120
14. Dessev, T., Jury, V., & Le-Bail, A. (2011). The effect of moisture content on short infrared absorptivity of bread dough. Journal of Food Engineering, 104, 571-576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2011.01.019
15. Hackenberg, S., Jekle, M., & Becker, T. (2018). Mechanical wheat flour modification and its effect on protein network structure and dough rheology. Food Chemistry, 248, 296-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FOODCHEM.2017.12.054
16. Jiang, H., Zheng, L., Zou, Y., Tong, Z., Han, S., & Wang, S. (2019). 3D food printing: main components selection by considering rheological properties. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 59, 2335-2347. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2018.1514363
17. Kim, H.W., Lee, I.J., Park, S.M., Lee, J.H., Nguyen, M.H., & Park, H.J. (2019). Effect of hydrocolloid addition on dimensional stability in post-processing of 3D printable cookie dough. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 101, 69-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2018.11.019
18. Krishnaraj, P., Anukiruthika, T., Choudhary, P., Moses, J.A., & Anandharamakrishnan, C. (2019). 3D Extrusion Printing and Post-Processing of Fibre-Rich Snack from Indigenous Composite Flour. Food and Bioprocess Technology; 12, 1776-1786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-019-02336-5
19. Mann, J., Schiedt, B., Baumann, A., Conde-Petit, B., & Vilgis, T.A. (2014). Effect of heat treatment on wheat dough rheology and wheat protein solubility. Food Science and Technology International, 20, 341-351. https://doi.org/10.1177/1082013213488381
20. Nowak, D., & Lewicki, P.P. (2004). Infrared drying of apple slices. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies, 5, 353- 360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2004.03.003
21. Perry, P., & Donald, A. (2002). The effect of sugars on the gelatinisation of starch. Carbohydrate Polymers, 49, 155-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8617(01)00324-1
22. Severini, C., Derossi, A., & Azzollini, D. (2016). Variables affecting the printability of foods: preliminary tests on cereal-based products. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies, 38, 281-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IFSET.2016.10.001
23. Severini, C., Azzollini, D., Albenzio, M., & Derossi, A. (2018). On printability, quality and nutritional properties of 3D printed cereal based snacks enriched with edible insects. Food Research International, 106, 666-676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.01.034
24. Sun, J., Zhou, W., Yan, L., Huang, D., Lin, L. (2018). Extrusion-based food printing for digitalized food design and nutrition control. Journal of Food Engineering, 220, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2017.02.028
25. Vanin, F.M., Lucas, T., Trystram, G., & Michon, C. (2018). Biaxial extensional viscosity in wheat flour dough during baking. Journal of Food Engineering, 236, 29-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2018.05.007
26. Wagner, M.J., Lucas, T., Le Ray, D., & Trystram, G. (2007). Water transport in bread during baking. Journal of Food Engineering, 78, 1167-1173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.12.029
27. Wählby, U., & Skjöldebrand, C. (2002). Reheating characteristics of crust formed on buns, and crust formation. Journal of Food Engineering, 53, 177-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(01)00154-6
28. Wang, K-Q., Luo, S-Z., Zhong, X.Y., Cai, J., Jiang, S.T., & Zheng, Z. (2017) Changes in chemical interactions and protein conformation during heat-induced wheat gluten gel formation. Food Chemistry, 214, 393-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.07.037
29. Yang, F., Zhang, M., Prakash, S., & Liu, Y. (2018). Physical properties of 3D printed baking dough as affected by different compositions. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies, 49, 202-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2018.01.001
30. Zhang, L., Lou, Y., & Schutyser, M. A. I. (2018). 3D printing of cereal-based food structures containing probiotics. Food Structure, 18, 14-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foostr.2018.10.002
Review
For citations:
Martekha A.N., Kaverina Yu.E. Kinetic evaluation and optimization of the drying process of 3D printed pasta. Storage and Processing of Farm Products. 2022;(2). (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36107/10.36107/spfp.2022.295
Views:
369
Email this article 