Case Study Analysis: The Genre Architecture and its Applicability in The Scope of The Journal
https://doi.org/10.36107/spfp.2022.382
Abstract
Purpose. To analyze the practice of designing and implementing a case study, the prospects of this direction for the development of science.
The Сase Study as a Tool of Scientific Communication. The case study as a research strategy has ample opportunities for use in research practice, allows you to formulate preliminary conclusions, test a hypothesis or identify new factors when analyzing non-standard re¬sults. There are various typologies of case studies that provide researchers with ample opportunities to learn the cases under study. Following the case study protocol significantly increases its validity and transparency. The flexibility of the approach and the ability to combine various methods to study phenomena studied in their natural realities expand the horizons of traditional qualitative research.
Conclusion. The case study methodology is used in various fields of science, as this method allows you to use flexible technologies to analyze information related to specific cases.
About the Authors
Elena V. Tikhonova
Moscow State University of Food Production
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nataliya N. Shlenskay
Moscow State Universityt of Food Production
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Варганова, Г. В. (2006). Кейс-стадис как метод научного исследования. Библиосфера, (2), 36-42.
2. Михайлов, А. С. (2014). Кейс-стади – исследовательская стратегия или мета-метод? Экономика и социум, (3-2), 543-551.
3. Тищенко, Н. В. (2015). Особенности применения метода кейс-стади в культурологических исследованиях. Теория и практика общественного развития, (10), 197-199.
4. Пискунова, Е. В. (2021). Изучение кейса как метод гуманитарного исследования. Вестник Череповецкого государственного университета, (2), 193-201.
5. Полухина, Е. В. (2014). Case-study как исследовательская стратегия. В Проблемы и перспективы использования метода Сase-study: Междисциплинарный опыт: Сборник научных статей по итогам междисциплинарного научного семинара кадрового резерва (с. 5-22). СПб.: Высшая школа экономики.
6. Жеребцов, М. В. (2004). Метод «case-study» в прикладных политологических исследованиях. Вестник Московского университета. Управление (государство и общество), (1), 1-16.
7. Anastas, J. W., & Macdonald, M. L. (1994) Research design for social work and human services. New York, Lexington.
8. Andersson, C., & Runeson, P. (2007). A spiral process model for case studies on software quality monitoring – method and metrics. Software Process: Improvement and Practice, 12(2), 125-140. https://doi.org/10.1002/spip.311
9. Beyer, M., Lenouvel, A., Guignard, C., Eickermann, M., Clermont, A., Kraus, F., & Hoffmann, L. (2018). Pesticide residue profiles in bee bread and pollen samples and the survival of honeybee colonies-a case study from Luxembourg. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 25(32), 32163-32177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3187-4
10. Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B., Budgen, D., & Li, Z. (2008). Using a protocol template for case study planning. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (pp. 41-48). BCS Learning & Development Ltd., Swindon.
11. Denzin, N. (1984). The research act. Prentice Hall.
12. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1991). Better stories and better constructs: The case for rigor and comparative logic. Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 620-627. https://doi.org/10.2307/258921
13. El Ati-Hellal, M., Doggui, R., Krifa, Y., & El Ati, J. (2018). Potassium bromate as a food additive: A case study of Tunisian breads. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 25(3), 2702-2706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0712-9
14. Feagin, J., Orum, A., & Sjoberg, G. (Eds.). (1991). A case for case study. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
15. Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219-245. https://10.1177/ 1077800405284.363
16. Gerring, J. (2007). Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge University Press.
17. Gomm, R., Hammersley, M., & Foster, P. (2000). Case study method: Key issues, key texts. London: Sage Publications.
18. Host, M., & Runeson, P. (2007). Checklists for software engineering case study research. In First international symposium on empirical software engineering and measurement (pp. 479-481). Madrid: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ESEM.2007.46
19. Kitchenham, B., Pickard, L., & Pfleeger, S. L. (1995). Case studies for method and tool evaluation. IEEE Software, 12(4), 52-62. https://doi.org/10.1109/52.391832
20. Klein, H. K., & Myers, M. D. (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretative field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 67-88. https://doi.org/10.2307/249410
21. Lethbridge, T. C., Sim, S. E., & Singer, J. (2005). Studying software engineers: data collection techniques for software field studies. Empirical Software Engineering, 10(3), 311-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-005-1290-x
22. Lijphart, A. (1971). Comparative politics and comparative method. American Political Science Review, 65(3), 682-693.
23. Martins, I. B. A., Oliveira, D., Rosenthal, A., Ares, G., & Deliza, R. (2019). Brazilian consumer's perception of food processing technologies: A case study with fruit juice. Food Research International, 125, Article 108555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108555
24. Merriam, C. (1991). Case Study research in education: A qualitative approach. Jossey-Bass.
25. Ridder, H. G. (2017). The theory contribution of case study research designs. Business Research, 10, 281-305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-017-0045-z
26. Robson, C. (2002). Real World Research. Blackwell (2nd ed.). Wiley.
27. Runeson, P., & Höst, M. (2009). Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering. Empirical Software Engineering, 14, Article 131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-008-9102-8
28. Seaman, C. (1999). Qualitative methods in empirical studies of software engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 25(4), 557-572. https://doi.org/10.1109/32.799955
29. Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (2008). Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294-308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907313077
30. Tellis, W. (1997). Application of a case study methodology. The Qualitative Report, 3(3), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/1997.2015
31. Yin, R. K. (1984). Case study research. Design and methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
32. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. Zainal, Z. (2007). Case study as a research method. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 5(1), 1-6.
35. Литературные источники, упомянутые в анализируемой статье (Martins et al., 2019)
36. Cardello, A. V. (2003). Consumer concerns and expectations about novel food processing technologies: Effects on product liking. Appetite, 40(3), 217-233. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0195-6663(03)00008-4
37. Cardello, A. V., Schutz, H. G., & Lesher, L. L. (2007). Consumer perceptions of foods processed by innovative and emerging technologies: A conjoint analytic study. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 8(1), 73-83. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.ifset.2006.07.002
38. Coppola, A., Verneau, F., & Caracciolo, F. (2014). Neophobia in food consumption: An empirical application of the FTNS scale in southern Italy. Italian Journal of Food Science, 26(1), 81-90.
39. Cox, D. N., & Evans, G. (2008). Construction and validation of a psychometric scale to measure consumers' fears of novel food technologies: The food technology neophobia scale. Food Quality and Preference, 19(8), 704-710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. foodqual.2008.04.005.
40. Deliza, R., & Ares, G. (2018). Consumer perception of novel technologies. In Fruit preservation - novel and conventional technologies (vol. 1, pp. 1-20). New York: Springer.
41. Deliza, R., Rosenthal, A., & Silva, A. L. S. (2003). Consumer attitude towards information on non conventional technology. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 14(1), 43-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2244(02)00240-6.
42. Lee, P. Y., Lusk, K., Mirosa, M., & Oey, I. (2015). Effect of information on Chinese consumers' perceptions and purchase intention for beverages processed by high pressure processing, pulsed-electric field and heat treatment. Food Quality and Preference, 40, 16-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.08.006
43. Mireaux, M., Cox, D. N., Cotton, A., & Evans, G. (2007). An adaptation of repertory grid methodology to evaluate Australian consumers' perceptions of food products produced by novel technologies. Food Quality and Preference, 18(6), 834-848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.01.012
44. Ronteltap, A., van Trijp, J. C. M., Renes, R. J., & Frewer, L. J. (2007). Consumer acceptance of technology-based food innovations: Lessons for the future of nutrigenomics. Appetite, 49(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2007.02.002
45. Rozin, P., Fischler, C., Imada, S., Sarubin, A., & Wrzesniewski, A. (1999). Attitudes to food and the role of food in life in the U.S.A., Japan, Flemish Belgium and France: Possible implications for the diet–health debate. Appetite, 33(2), 163-180. https://doi.org/10. 1006/appe.1999.0244
46. Sonne, A. M., Grunert, K. G., Veflen, O. N., Granli, B. S., Szabó, E., & Banati, D. (2012). Consumers' perceptions of HPP and PEF food products. British Food Journal, 114(1), 85-107. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070701211197383
47. Vidigal, M. C. T. R., Minim, V. P. R., Moreira, R. T., Pires, A. C. S., Ferreira, M. A. M., Gonçalves, A. C. A., & Minim, L. A. (2014). Tradução e validação para a língua portuguesa da escala de neofobia em relação à tecnologia de alimentos: Food technology neophobia scale. Ciência Rural, 44, 174-180. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103- 84782013005000150
48. Vidigal, M. C. T. R., Minim, V. P. R., Simiqueli, A. A., Souza, P. H. P., Balbino, D. F., & Minim, L. A. (2015). Food technology neophobia and consumer attitudes toward foods produced by new and conventional technologies: A case study in Brazil. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 60(2, part 1), 832-840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt. 2014.10.058
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Tikhonova E.V., Shlenskay N.N. Case Study Analysis: The Genre Architecture and its Applicability in The Scope of The Journal. Storage and Processing of Farm Products. 2022;(4). (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36107/spfp.2022.382
Views:
615
Email this article 