Effective Strategies for Writing Research Articles: Constructing Strong Purpose and Research Questions

Introduction: Effectively defining objectives and formulating research questions, tasks, and hypotheses are key factors determining the success of a research article publication. However, reviewers often note unsuccessful strategies employed by authors in developing these components of the manuscript.

Purpose: This article aims to explore the key aspects of formulating objectives, research questions, tasks, and hypotheses for empirical research to assist manuscript authors in developing clear and well-founded research objectives.

Results: The article emphasizes the importance of clarity and specificity in formulations to ensure the focus and effectiveness of the research. Common mistakes made when formulating objectives and tasks are discussed, and examples of their correction are provided. Improved versions of formulating objectives, tasks, research questions, and hypotheses are illustrated. Strategies for avoiding general formulations and the necessity of justifying the significance of the research to the reader are also discussed. The presented step-by-step scheme aims to assist researchers in developing clear and well-founded objectives and tasks, which contributes to successful research and obtaining meaningful results.

Conclusion: Effective formulation of objectives, tasks, research questions, and hypotheses plays a crucial role in the successful conduct of empirical research. A proper approach to developing these components helps avoid common mistakes, improve research focus, and contribute to achieving significant and relevant results. The recommendations presented in the article will help researchers create more structured and well-founded studies, increasing their chances of successful publication and recognition in the scientific community.

1. Тихонова, Е.В. (2024). Эффективные стратегии написания научных статей: обоснование пробела в существующем знании в предметной области. Хранение и переработка сельхозсырья, 32(1), 8-16. https://doi.org/10.36107/spfp.2024.1.561

2. Abbott, A. (2004). Methods of discovery: Heuristics for the social sciences. New York: Norton.

3. Alvesson, M, & Sandberg, J. (2011). Generating research questions through problematization. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 247–71.

4. Hulley, S.B., & Cummings, S.R. (2007). Conceiving the research question. In S.B. Hulley, S.R. Cummings, W.S. Browner, D. Grady, N. Hearst, & T.B. Newman (Eds). Designing clinical research (pp. 17–25). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.

5. Jones, R. (2013). How to read and appraise a research paper. InnovAiT, 6(2), 103-107. https://doi.org/10.1177/1755738012467338

6. Ratan, S. K., Anand, T., & Ratan, J. (2019). Formulation of research question - Stepwise approach. Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons, 24(1), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_76_18

7. Smith, K. G., & Hitt, M. A. (Eds.). (2005). Great minds in management: The process of developing theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

8. Starbuck, W. H. (2006). The production of knowledge: The challenge of social science research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

9. Tikhonova, E. V., & Mezentseva, D. A. (2024). Wordiness in academic writing: a systematic scoping review. Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 133-157. https://doi.org/10.18413/2313-8912-2024-10-1-0-8

10. Van de Ven, A. H. (2007). Engaged scholarship. A guide for organizational and social research. New York: Oxford University Press.

11. Zhang W. (2014). Ten simple rules for writing research papers. PLoS Сomputational Biology, 10(1), e1003453. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003453