Improvement of Sugar Beet Technological Quality as a Result of Foliar Application of the Biologic “Bioterra Antistress”
https://doi.org/10.36107/spfp.2020.313
Abstract
The major problem facing an agrarian complex of the Russian Federation is yield increase and technological quality improvement of beet roots that is impossible without complete nutrient supply of plants. Aim of our investigations was to study changes of sugar beet technological indices depending on foliar application of “BioTerra Antistress”, a new complex biologic, for plants. For an objective appraisal of this biologic application effectiveness, the studies were carried out in industrial beet fields of 3 farms (OOO YUVAG, Voronezh region; OOO Zolotaya niva, Tambov region; and OOO Agroproduct) in 2019, where different hybrids were sown, and sampling was conducted during different periods to determine biological yield and technological characteristics of beet roots. Foliar double application on the “BioTerra Antistress” biologic with the optimal consumption rate of 1.3 l/ha for sugar beet plants (at the stage of 2–3 pairs of leaves, and at the stage of crop closing) allowed obtaining gain of beet yield (5.0–12.5 t/ha, or 9.1–14.7%) and sugar content (0.30–0.70 absolute %) as compared to the corresponding control variants under different soil-environmental conditions. Samples of the experimental variants surpassed the control ones – without treatment – in sugar output (by 0.28–0.58 absolute %). As for white sugar yield per 1 hectare, it was more by 1.34 t/ha (19.42%) in Voronezh region, 0.83 t/ha (11.38%) in Tambov region, and 2.17 t/ha (18.55%) in Bryansk region, respectively. Developed by the company OOO NPF EkoBioTekhnologiya the new complex biologic “BioTerra Antistress” which composition includes several various active substances (macro- and microelements in the chelated form, humic compounds, organic acids, and microorganisms) with the different influence mechanisms showed stable effect under a wide range of soil-environmental conditions. The obtained data of the experiments on a farm scale allow recommending the biologic as an ecologically safe one for practical use with consumption rate of 1.3 l/ha for sugar beet as it promotes increase of yield, sugar content, forecasted sugar output, white sugar yield, per 1 hectare and profitability of the mentioned agricultural method.
About the Authors
L. N. PutilinaRussian Federation
Lyudmila N. Putilina
86, VNIISS, Voronezh region, 396030
N. A. Lazutina
Russian Federation
Nadezhda A. Lazutina
86, VNIISS, Voronezh region, 396030
References
1. Askarov V.R. Vliyanie mikroudobreniy i fungitsidov na produktivnost sveklovichnykh posevov [Productivity of sugar beet depending on use microfertilizers and fungicides]. Sakharnaya svekla [Sugar beet], 2016, no. 9, pp. 39–42.
2. Buldykova I.A., SHeudzhen A. Kh. Vliyanie mikroudobreniy na urozhaynost i kachestvo korneplodov sakharnoy svekly [Influence of microfertilizers on productivity and quality of sugar beet roots]. Nauchnyy zhurnal KubGAU [Scientific journal of KubSAU], 2014, no. 98(04), pp. 14–24.
3. Daskin V.Yu., Antonova O.I. Formirovanie kachestva urozhaya pri vnesenii Intermag Profi Svekla i Intermag Element Bor [Results of application of Intermag Pro Beet and Intermag Element Bor in crops of sugar beet]. Sakharnaya svekla [Sugar beet], 2013, no. 4, pp. 24–26.
4. Dvoryankin E.A., Dvoryankin A.E., YAroщuk M.S. Vliyanie lignogumata Na i podkormok azotom na aktivnost mikrobiologicheskikh protsessov v pochve [Influence of nitrogen and Na lignohumate additional fertilizing on activity of microbiological processes in soil E.A. Dvoryank]. Sakharnaya svekla [Sugar beet], 2010, no 4, pp. 19–21.
5. Dyakov Yu.T. Griby i rasteniya [Mushrooms and Plants]. Priroda [Nature], 2003, no. 5, pp. 73-78.
6. Gavrin D.S., Bartenev I.I., Kravets M.V. Osobennosti sovremennykh mikroudobreniy [Features of modern micronutrient fertilizers]. Sakharnaya svekla [Sugar beet], 2012, no. 4, pp. 27–29.
7. Gureev I.I. Optimizatsiya pitaniya selskokhozyaystvennykh kultur [Nutrition optimization of crops]. Sakharnaya svekla [Sugar beet], 2017, no. 5, pp. 10–13.
8. Ivanovskiy M.N., Rodionov K.L., Malykhin A.V. Rol mikroudobreniy v formirovanii produktivnosti v usloviyakh TSentralnogo CHernozemya [Influence of microfertilizers on effi ciency of sugar beet in the conditions of the Central Black Earth region]. Sakharnaya svekla [Sugar beet], 2013, no. 1, pp. 27–29.
9. Kharchenko S.V. Vliyanie nekornevykh podkormok mikroelementami na urozhay i kachestvo korneplodov sakharnoy svekly v usloviyakh lesostepi TSCHZ. Avtopef. diss. kand. s.-kh. nauk. [Influence of foliar dressing with microelements on the yield and quality of sugar beet root crops in the forest-steppe conditions of the Central Chernozem Region. Abstract of Ph.D.(Agricultural Sciences) thesis]. Voronezh, 2010. 23 p.
10. Kostin O.V, Syapukov E.E., Syapukov I.A. Vliyanie vnekornevoy podkormki na tekhnologicheskie kachestva sakharnoy svekly [Influence of foliar feeding on the technological qualities of sugar beet]. In Sovremennye problemy tekhnologii proizvodstva, khraneniya, pererabotki i ekspertizy kachestva produktsii [Modern problems of production technology, storage, processing and examination of product quality]. Michurinsk: Izd. FGOU VPO Mich. GAU, 2007. Vol. 1, pp. 124–127.
11. Kostin V.I., Mulyanov A.G. Vliyanie preduborochnoy vnekornevoy podkormki na kachestvo i tekhnologicheskie pokazateli sakharnoy svekly [Influence of pre-harvest foliar feeding on the quality and technological indicators of sugar beet]. In Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsiya «Energosberegayushchie tekhnologii v rastenievodstve» [Energy saving technologies in plant growing: Proceedings of All-Russian scientific-practical conference]. Penza, 2005, pp. 66–68.
12. Ksenz L.I., Rutskaya S.I. Nekornevaya podkormka svekly [Foliar feeding of sugar beets]. Sakharnaya svekla [Sugar beet], 1983, no. 6, pp. 30–31.
13. Leщenko E.V., Borisyuk V.A. Nekornevaya podkormka [Folia feeding]. Sakharnaya svekla [Sugar beet], 1991, no. 3, pp. 31–33.
14. Minakova O.A., Kosyakin P.A., Aleksandrova L.V. Effektivnost razlichnykh vidov podkormki sakharnoy svekly v TSCHR [Effectiveness of different types of sugar beet additional fertilizing in the Central Black-Earth region]. Sakhar [Sugar], 2019, no. 3, pp. 52–55.
15. Nurmukhametov N.M., Miftakhova A.M., Bagautdinova G.G., Kireeva N.A. Biopreparaty na osnove endomikoriznykh gribov dlya povysheniya produktivnosti selskokhozyaystvennykh kultur [Biological products based on endomycorrhizal fungi to increase the productivity of agricultural crops]. Vestnik Bashkirskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Bashkir university], 2009, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 395–399.
16. Putilina L.N., Gavrin D.S., Kulneva N.G. Formirovanie tekhnologicheskogo kachestva korneplodov sakharnoy svekly pod deystviem vnekornevykh podkormok [Formation of sugar beet root technological quality under influence of foliar applications]. Tekhnologii piщevoy i pererabatyvayuщey promyshlennosti APK – produkty zdorovogo pitaniya [Technologies of Food and Processing Industry of the Agro-Industrial Complex – Healthy Food Products], 2020, no. 1, pp. 49–58.
17. Putilina L.N., Kosyakin P.A., Lazutina N.A. Vliyanie mikroudobreniy v khelatnoy forme na tekhnologicheskoe kachestvo i produktivnost sakharnoy svekly v usloviyakh TSCHR [Influence of microfertilizers in chelate form on technological quality and productivity of sugar beet under the central black-earth region conditions]. Sakhar [Sugar], 2018, no. 3, pp. 42–45.
18. Ramazanov R.R., Nazarenko D.Yu., Pozharskiy V.G. Innovatsionnyy element v tekhnologii vyraщivaniya sakharnoy svekly [An innovative element in the sugar beet growing technology]. Sakharnaya svekla [Sugar beet], 2017, no. 3, pp. 20–21.
19. Savenko O.V. Effektivnost listovykh podkormok sakharnoy svekly udobreniyami-biostimulyatorami «Agritekno Fertilizantes» [Efficiency of sugar beet foliar feeding with biostimulant fertilizers “Agritecno Fertilisantes”]. Sakharnaya svekla [Sugar Beet], 2012, no.4, pp. 24–26.
20. Sheudzhen A.Kh., Bondareva T.N., Kizinek S.V. Agrokhimicheskie osnovy primeneniya udobreniy [Agrochemical basis for the use of fertilizers]. Maykop: «Poligraf-YUg», 2013. 572 p.
21. Shpaar D., Dreger D., Zakharenko A. Sakharnaya svyokla (Vyrashchivaniye, uborka, khraneniye) [Sugar beet (Growing, harvesting, storage)]. Moscow: ID OOO «DLV Agrodelo», 2012. 315 p.
22. Sushkov M.D. Mineralnoe pitanie i listovaya podkormka sakharnoy svekly – zalog vysokogo urozhaya [Mineral nutrition and foliar feeding of sugar beets are the key to a high yield]. Sakharnaya svekla [Sugar beet], 2016, no. 2, pp. 19–22.
23. Vlasova Y.V. «Ultramag Kombi»: mikroudobreniya, kotorye razryvayut shablony [“Ultramag Combi”: micronutrient fertilizers that break patterns]. Sakhar [Sugar], 2018, no 5, pp. 20–22.
Review
For citations:
Putilina L.N., Lazutina N.A. Improvement of Sugar Beet Technological Quality as a Result of Foliar Application of the Biologic “Bioterra Antistress”. Storage and Processing of Farm Products. 2020;(3):9-19. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36107/spfp.2020.313