Predicting the Development of Clamp Rot of Sugar Beet Depending on the Parameters of the Environment
https://doi.org/10.36107/spfp.2020.344
Abstract
The sugar beet processing process is seasonal, with up to 60% of the harvested crop subject to storage, which increases the duration of the production season to 200 days. The objective of this study is to predict the development of microflora depending on physical factors during storage of raw materials. Changes in the physiological and physical state of beets during storage lead to losses as a result of the vital activity of microorganisms developing on the root tissues. The sources of spoilage are various bacteria and fungi in the air and on the root surface: Botrytis cinerea, Fusarium, Penicillium, etc. Temperature is an important regulating factor influencing the aggressiveness of the causative agents of beet root rot. Infection of sugar beet with pathogens is observed at temperatures of 10°C and above. The experimental data obtained by various researchers (Sviridov A.V., Stognienko O.I., Selivanova G.A.) were used for approximation. The processing was carried out using the example of Ph. Betae. On the basis of methods of mathematical modeling, attempts have been made to restore mathematical laws using polynomials of various degrees. The approximation was carried out using the Mathcad tools. On the basis of the available data, a general model was developed for calculating the intensity of infection of sugar beet by pathogenic microorganisms of clump rot depending on temperature. The resulting model makes it possible, on the basis of changing experimental data, to obtain patterns of microflora development and to predict the weight loss of root crops under storage conditions.
About the Authors
L. Korobova
Voronezh State University engineering technologies
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Lyudmila A. Korobova
394036, Russia, Voronezh, Revolution Avenue, 19
N. Kulneva
Voronezh State University engineering technologies
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nadezhda G. Kulneva
394036, Russia, Voronezh, Revolution Avenue, 19
References
1. Agafonov G.V., Kul’neva N.G., Putilina L.N. O tekhnologicheskom kachestve sakharnoi svekly, porazhennoi sosudistym bakteriozom [On the technological quality of sugar beets affected by vascular bacteriosis]. Khranenie i pererabotka sel’khozsyr’ya [Storage and processing of farm products], 2018, no. 1, pp. 46–50.
2. Borisyuk P.G. Osobennosti khimicheskogo sostava korneplodov i ikh izmeneniya vo vremya khraneniya [Peculiarities of the chemical composition of root crops and their changes during storage]. Vestnik sakharnikov Ukrainy[Bulletin of sugar producers of Ukraine], 2014, no. 11(102), pp. 2–9.
3. Vostrukhin N.V., Chernyavskaya L.I. Poteri sakharozy i ikh snizhenie pri khranenii sakharnoi svekly [Chernyavskaya LI Sucrose losses and their decrease during storage of sugar beets]. Minsk: Agropromizdat, 2004. 112 p.
4. Shkalikov V.A., Beloshapkina O.O., Bukreev D.D., Gorbachev I.V., Dzhalilov S.-U., Minaev V.Y.. Zashchita rastenii ot boleznei [Plant protection against diseases]. 3rd ed. Moscow: KolosS, 2010. 404 p.
5. Zemtsov S.M., Goryainov A.V. Gnili korneplodov – mnogo voprosov i malo otvetov? [Root rot - many questions and few answers]. Sakhar [Sugar], 2017, no. 4, pp. 2–5.
6. Kalinin A.T., Kalinin A.A. Kak uluchshit’ tekhnologicheskie kachestva sakharnoi svekly [How to improve the technological qualities of sugar beet]. Sakharnaya svekla[Sugar beet], 2003, no. 5, pp. 6.
7. Kolyagin Yu.S. Sakharnaya svekla [Sugar beet]. In Biologizatsiya i adaptivnaya intensifikatsiya zemledeliya v Tsentral’nom Chernozem’e[Biologization and Adaptive Intensification of Agriculture in the Central Black Earth Region]. Voronezh, 2000, pp. 182–190.
8. Kornienko A.V., Nanaenko G.A. Optimizatsiya uslovii vyrashchivaniya pri defitsite resursov [Opti mization of growing conditions with a shortage of resources]. Sakharnaya svekla[Sugar beet], 2000, no. 10, pp. 12.
9. Lukashova U.V., Bugaev Yu.V., Korobova L.A. Prognozirovanie vozmozhnykh poter’ pri khranenii sel’sko khozyaistvennogo syr’ya v zavisimosti ot pogodnykh uslovii [Designing a method for combating sugar beet root rot during post-harvest storage to improve the quality of raw materials in the sugar industry]. In Inzhenernye tekhnologii dlya ustoichivogo razvitiya i integratsii obrazovaniya, nauki i proizvodstva: mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya imeni V.I. Vernadskogo [System Analysis and Modeling of Quality Management Processes in the Innovative Development of the Agroindustrial Comple: Proceedings of the 4thInternational Scientific and Practical Conference]. Tambov: Izdatel’skii tsentr F.B.U VO «TGTU», 2020. T, 2, pp. 60–64.
10. Kul’neva N.G., Selezneva I.G., Sveshnikov I.Y.., Kazakevich S.Y.. Kontrol’ pokazatelei sakharnoi svekly razlichnogo kachestva pri khranenii [Control of indicators of sugar beets of various quality during storage]. Khranenie i pererabotka sel’khozsyr’ya[Storage and processing of agricultural raw materials], 2017, no. 4, pp. 32–34.
11. Sapronov N.M., Aksenov D.M., Smirnova L.Y.. Khranenie sakharnoi svekly raznoi stepeni spelosti pod modifitsirovannym ukrytiem [Storage of sugar beets of varying ripeness under a modified shelter]. Vestnik Kurskoi gosudarstvennoi sel’skokhozyaistvennoi akademii [Bulletin of the Kursk State Agricultural Academy], 2015, no. 7, pp. 139–141.
12. Sviridov A.V. Agrobiologicheskoe obosnovanie razvitiya gnilei korneplodov svekly sakharnoi i stolovoi i razrabotka sistemy zashchity po ogranicheniyu ikh vredonosnosti v respublike Belarus’. Avtopef. diss. d-ra s.-kh. Nauk [Agrobiological substantiation of the development of root rot of sugar beet and table beet and the development of a protection system to limit their harmfulness in the Republic of Belarus. Abstract of Dr. (Agriculture) thesis]. Gorki, 2016. 48 p.
13. Sviridov A.V., Doroshkevich E.I., Prosviryakov V.V., Kulikovskii S.E. Faktory, vliyayushchie na mikroklimat v kagatakh sakharnoi svekly [Factors affecting the microclimate in sugar beet piles]. Zashchita i karantin rastenii[Plant protection and quarantine], 2013, no. 11, pp. 17–20.
14. Sviridov A.V., Zenchik S.S. Morfologicheskie priznaki i ekologicheskie osobennosti razvitiya vozbuditelei kagatnoi gnili stolovoi svekly [Morphological signs and ecological features of the development of pathogens of clump rot of table beet]. Zemlyarobstva і akhova raslіn[Earthmaking and ahova raslin], 2012, no. 4, pp. 33–37.
15. Selivanova G.A., Smirnov M.A. Sostav fitopatogennogo kompleksa kagatnoi gnili matochnoi sakharnoi svekly v zavisimosti ot pogodnykh uslovii [The composition of the phytopathogenic complex of clump rot of mother sugar beet depending on weather conditions]. Sakharnaya svekla[Sugar beet], 2019, no. 5, pp. 21–24. http://doi.org/10.25802/SB.2019.11.40.005
16. Selivanova G.A., Smirnov M.A. Vidovoi sostav vozbuditelei kagatnoi gnili matochnoi sakharnoi svekly pri khranenii [Species composition of pathogens of clump rot of mother sugar beet during storage]. Sakhar [Sugar], 2019, no. 8, pp. 22–25.
17. Selivanova G.A., Stognienko O.I. Gnili korneplodov sakharnoi svekly [Root rot of sugar beet]. Zashchita i karantin rastenii[Root rot of sugar beet], 2010, no. 10, pp. 16–17.
18. Selivanova G.A., Stognienko O.I. Vidovoi sostav vozbuditelei kornevykh gnilei sakharnoi svekly [Species composition of causative agents of sugar beet root rot]. Sakharnaya svekla[Sugar beet], 2007, no. 1, pp. 28–31.
19. Smirnov M.A., Selivanova G.A. Vliyanie sposoba obrabotki pered khraneniem na velichinu kagatnoi gnili matochnykh korneplodov sakharnoi svekly i ee vidovoi sostav [Selivanova Influence of the method of processing before storage on the amount of rotten rot of uterine roots of sugar beet and its species composition]. Sakharnaya svekla[Sugar beet], 2020, no. 5, pp. 36–39. http://doi.org/10.25802/SB.2020.29.39.004
20. Stognienko O.I., Stognienko E.S. Vidovoi sostav vozbuditelei semennoi infektsii sakharnoi svekly [Species composition of causative agents of seed infection of sugar beet]. Sakharnaya svekla[Sugar beet], 2019, no. 2, pp. 42–43. http://doi.org/10.25802/SB.2019.93.51.005.
21. Stognienko O.I., Selivanova G.A. Vidovoi sostav i kharakteristika vozbuditelei kagatnoi gnili [Species composition and characteristics of pathogens of clump rot]. Sakharnaya svekla[Sugar beet], 2012, no. 9, pp. 39–40.
22. Stognienko O.I., Vorontsova A.I. Vidovoi sostav vozbuditelei kagatnoi gnili sakharnoi svekly pri kratkosrochnom khranenii v polevykh burtakh [Species composition of pathogens of clump rot of sugar beet during short-term storage in field piles]. Zashchita i karantin rastenii[Plant protection and quarantine], 2015, vol. 1, pp. 26–28.
23. Shpaar D., Dreger D., Zakharenko A., Kalenskaya S. Sakharnaya svekla [Sugar beet]. Minsk: ООО «FUAinform», 2000, 258 p.
Review
For citations:
Korobova L., Kulneva N. Predicting the Development of Clamp Rot of Sugar Beet Depending on the Parameters of the Environment. Storage and Processing of Farm Products. 2020;(4):79-88. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36107/spfp.2020.344
Views:
358
Email this article 