Systematic Review and Features of Writing
https://doi.org/10.36107/spfp.2021.182
Abstract
Scientific journals publish the original scientific research of authors, the results of experiments and scientific experiments, as primary scientific literature, while review articles are also a popular and widespread type of scientific publication. Every year all over the world there is an increase in the number of scientific publications in various fields of research, and review articles are gaining more and more importance as publications helping to assess the depth of research carried out, to make their comparability and identify common patterns. It is the review articles that make it possible to determine the directions for further research and identify factors that can be eliminated in research. Although the actual comparison of primary sources can be done using statistical methods, full comparison and analysis is only available to humans. The article considers the review as a promising type of scientific publication. The classification of reviews and the peculiarities of writing a systematic review are given. Comparison of publication activity by type of articles "review" in the Scopus database in the field of food and processing industries.
About the Authors
Nataliya M. Shlenskaya
Moscow State University of Food Production
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Galina A. Khorokhorina
Moscow State University of Food Production
Academy of Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Fam, M. (2019) Six Tricks for Review Writing: From Editors' Recommendations to Elsevier Journal Authors. Nauchnyi Redaktor I Izdatel' [Science Editor and Publisher], 4(3–4), 211–212. https://doi.org/10.24069/2542-0267-2019-3-4-211-212
2. Gus'kov, A.E., Kosyakov, D.V., Bagirova, A.V., & Blinov, P.Yu. (2020). Citation factors for reviews. Vestnik RAN [Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences], 90(12), 1128-1140. https://doi.org/10.31857/S086958732012021X
3. Koikov, V.V. (2019). Good practice in writing a research publication. Chast' 3. Nauchno metodicheskie razrabotki [Part 3. Scientific and methodological developments], 4 (33), 4-14 https://doi.org/10.32921/2225-9929-2019-4-33-4-14
4. Kolkova, N. I. (1999). Methodology for the formalized compilation of reviews. Informatsionnaya kul'tura lichnosti: diagnostika, tekhnologiya formirovaniya. [Personal information culture: diagnostics, technology of formation] Kemerovo. Ch. 2. S. 45–88.
5. Lavrik, O. L., Pleshakova, M. A., & Kalyuzhnaya, T. A. (2018). Informatsionno-analiticheskie produkty v nauchnykh bibliotekakh dlya informatsionnogo obespecheniya NIR. Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie [Tomsk State University Journal of Cultural Studies and Art History], 4, 186–201. https://doi.org/10.17223/22220836/32/19
6. Lavrik, O.L., Kalyuzhnaya, T.A., & Pleshakova, M.A. (2019). A systematic review as type of review-analytical products. Bibliosfera, [Bibliosphere]. 2, 33-51. https://doi.org/10.20913/1815-3186-2019-2-33-51
7. Milchakov, K.S. (2019). Doing an information study in medicine: Tips about strategies and resources for literature review. Nauka i Zdravookhranenie [Science & Healthcare], (3), 68-76.
8. Raitskaya, L. K., & Tikhonova, E. V. (2019). Review as a promising type of scientific publication, its types and characteristics. Nauchnyi Redaktor i Izdatel' [Science Editor and Publisher], 4(3–4), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.24069/25420267-2019-3-4-131-139
9. Raitskaya, L. K., & Tikhonova, E. V. (2020). Review of surveys as a tool for identifying trends in the studied area of knowledge. Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher education in Russia], 29(3), 37-57. https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-3-37-57
10. Shevchenko L.B. (2009). Sources of survey information in Russia. Bibliosfera [Bibliosphere], (4), 65-69. https://www.bibliosphere.ru/jour/article/view/397/397
11. Zhuravel', E. Sh., & Korsunskaya, G. V. (1974). Classification of reviews. Nauchno-tekhnicheskaya informatsiya. Seriya 1, Organizatsiya i metodika informatsionnoi raboty [Scientific and technical information. Series 1, Organization and methodology of information work], 7, 14–17.
12. Andrews, R. (2005). The place of systematic reviews in education research. British Journal of Educational Studies, 53(4), 399-416. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2005.00303.x
13. Burgers C., Brugman B. C., & Boeynaems A. (2019). Systematic literature reviews: Four applications for interdisciplinary research. Journal of Pragmatics, 145, 102–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.04.004
14. Jäger-Dengler-Harles, I., Heck, T., & Rittberger, M. (2020). Systematic reviews as object to study relevance assessment processes. In Proceedings of ISIC, the Information Behaviour Conference, Pretoria, South Africa, 28 September - 1 October, 2020. Information Research, 25(4), paper isic2024. https://doi.org/10.47989/irisic2024
15. Ketcham, C.M., & Crawford, J.M. (2007) The impact of review articles. Laboratory Investigation, 87(12), 1174-1185. https://www.nature.com/articles/3700688.pdf?origin=ppub
16. Wolfe, J., Britt, C., & Poe Alexander, K. (2011). Teaching the IMRaD Genre: Sentence Combining and Pattern Practice Revisited. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 25(2), 119–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651910385785
Review
For citations:
Shlenskaya N.M., Khorokhorina G.A. Systematic Review and Features of Writing. Storage and Processing of Farm Products. 2021;(1). (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36107/spfp.2021.182
Views:
558
Email this article 