Forming of Technological Quality and Productivity of Sugar Beet as a Result of Action of Modern Fungicides
https://doi.org/10.36107/spfp.2021.184
Abstract
Actual problem of sugar beet growing in Russia today is damage of leaves of sugar beet by deceases and as a result loses in yield, sugar content and technological quality of roots. One of effective action to protect crop from different fungal deceases is fungicide application. Target of this research was in determination of efficacy modern fungicides with different modes of action, that applied during vegetation of sugar beet and detection of changes in morphological and technological parameters and productivity of the crop after chemical application. Research was conducted during 2018-2019 as a stationary trial of Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution “The A.L. Mazlumov All-Russian Research Institute of Sugar Beet and Sugar” (Voronezh region). Maximum effect was detected after application of crop protection scheme II, that included double application of vegetating crop of sugar beet with fungicide with combination of active ingredients – pyraclostrobin (62.5 g/l) and epoxiconazole (62.5 g/l). It was founded that independent from background of fertilizers this agronomic method effectively control growth of pathogenic fungal decease as powdery mildew and decrease of severity of decease on 76-85% that came to increase of coefficient of photosynthesis productivity and getting increase in yield on 12.3-13.1 t/ha, increase of planning sugar production on 0.65-1.11 abs, % and gross yield of cleaned up sugar on 2.2-2.4 t/ha. Received data allow recommend product with active ingredients pyraclostrobin+epoxiconazole to broad usage on sugar beet as a systemic fungicide with high prophylactic, curative and physiological activity.
About the Authors
Lyudmila N. Putilina
Federal State Budgetary Scientifi c Institution “The A.L. Mazlumov
All-Russian Research Institute of Sugar Beet and Sugar”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nadezhda A. Lazutina
Federal State Budgetary Scientifi c Institution “The A.L. Mazlumov
All-Russian Research Institute of Sugar Beet and Sugar”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Alekhin, V. T. (1984). Rekomendatsii po uchetu i vyyavleniyu vreditelei i boleznei sel'skokhozyaistvennykh rastenii [Recommendations for assessments and diagnostic of pests and deceases of agricultural crops]. Voronezh: VNIIZR.
2. Apasov, I. V., Putilina, L. N. & Selivanova, G. A. (2014). Izmenenie tekhnologicheskikh kachestv korneplodov sakharnoi svekly, porazhennykh sosudistym bakteriozom [Changes of technological qualities of sugar beet roots affected by vascular bacteriosis]. Sakhar [Sugar], 9, 35-38.
3. Bilai, V. I., Gvozdyak, R. I. & Skripal', I. G. (1988). Mikroorganizmy – vozbuditeli boleznei rastenii [Microorganisms – pathogens of the plant diseases]. Kiev: Naukova dumka.
4. Borisenko, V. K. (2012). Fal'kon – troinoi otvet boleznyam sakharnoi svekly [Falcon - the triple response to diseases of sugar beet]. Sakharnaya svekla [Sugar beet], 5, 21-22.
5. Chernyavskaya, L. I., Pustokhod, A. P. & Ivolga, N. S. (1995). Tekhnokhimicheskii kontrol' sakhara-peska i sakhara rafinada [Technological-chemical control of granulated and refinery sugar]. Moscow: Kolos.
6. Dronina, O. S., Kudryashov, A. V. & Dronina, A. S. (2008). Formirovanie assimilyatsionnogo apparata i produktivnost' fotosinteza sakharnoi svekly v zavisimosti ot predposevnoi obrabotki semyan biopreparatami i diatomitovym poroshkom [Formation of assimilative system and productivity of photosynthesis of sugar beet depending on preplant treatment of seeds by biological products and diatomic powder]. Agronomiya [Agronomy], 3, 12-14.
7. Dvoryankin, E. A. (2014). Pokazateli produktivnosti sakharnoi svekly pri razvitii tserkosporoza. Mery bor'by [Sugar beet productivity indices during cercosporosis development methods to control cercosporosis]. Sakharnaya svekla [Sugar Beet], 6, 26-30.
8. Grishechkina, L. D. & Silaev, A. I. (2011). Kombinirovannyi fungitsid na sakharnoi svekle [Combined fungicide in sugar beet]. Zashchita i karantin rastenii [Plant protection and quarantine], 5, 61-62.
9. Gulyaev, B. I., Rozhko, I. I., Rogachenko, A. D., Golik, K. N., Mitrofanov, B. A., & Bo-risyuk, V. A. (1989). Fotosintez, produktsionnyi protsess i produktivnost' sakharnoi svekly [Photosynthesis, production process and productivity of sugar beet]. Kiev: Naukova Dumka.
10. Gureev, I. I. & Revyakin, U. L. (2009). Innovatsionnyi opyt proizvodstva sakharnoi svekly v Tsentral'no-Chernozemnom regione [Innovative experience of production of sugar beet in the Central Black soil region]. Moscow: FGNU «Rosinformaagrotekh.
11. Krasnikov, A. S. (2016). Zashchita posevov sakharnoi svekly ot tserkosporoza v usloviyakh orosheniya na yuge Rossii [Protection of sugar beet crops from Cercospora in conditions of irrigation in the south of Russia]. Sakhar [Sugar], 5, 24-28.
12. Markov, I. L. (2011). Praktikum po sel'skokhozyaistvennoi fitopatologii [Practicum on the agricultural phytopatology]. Kiev: Uro-zhai. 2011.
13. Nikolenko, A. V. (2013). Izmenenie produktivnosti sakharnoi svekly pri porazhenii muchnistoi rosoi [Effect of infestation of sugar beet powdery mildew on crop productivity]. Sakharnaya svekla [Sugar beet], 5, 34-35.
14. Peresypkin, V. F. (1989). Bolezni sel'skokhozyaistvennykh kul'tur [Diseases of agricultural crops]. Kiev: Uro-zhai.
15. Prosviryakov, V. V. & Lotysh, I. Yu. (2010). Ispytaniya fungitsidov razlichnykh khimicheskikh grupp dlya zashchity sakharnoi svekly ot boleznei v period vegetatsii [Testing of fungicides of various chemical groups to protect sugar beet from diseases during the growing season]. In Sovremennye tekhnologii sel'skokhozyaistvennogo proizvodstva. Materialy XIII Mezhdunarod. nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii [Modern technologies of agricultural production. Proceedings of the 13th International. scientific and practical conference] (pp. 162-163). Grodno: Grodnenskii gosudarstvennyi agrarnyi universitet.
16. Prosviryakov, V. V. & Sviridov, A. V. (2009). Effektivnost' fungitsidov v zashchite sakharnoi svekly ot boleznei v period vegetatsii i pri khranenii korneplodov [The effectiveness of fungicides in protecting sugar beet from diseases during the growing season and during storage of root crops]. In Sel'skoe khozyaistvo – problemy i perspektivy. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov [Agriculture - problems and prospects. Proceedings of scientific papers] (vol. 1, pp. 148-157). Grodno: Grodnenskii gosudarstvennyi agrarnyi universitet.
17. Putilina, L. N., Kul'neva, N. G., Selivanova, G. A. & Zemlyanukhina, O. A. (2016). Tekhnologicheskaya otsenka sakharnoi svekly, infitsirovannoi vozbuditelyami sosudistogo bakterioza v period vegetatsii [Technological evaluation of sugar beets infected by vascular bacteriosis during vegetation]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta inzhenernykh tekhnologii [Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies Bulletin], 3, 239-247. https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2016-3-239-246
18. Sapronov, N. M., Bashkardina, E. V., Berdnikov, A. S. & Posashkov, P. A. (2009). Vliyanie fungitsida RIAS na tekhnologicheskie kachestva korneplodov [Influence of fungicide Rias on the technological quality of roots]. Sakharnaya svekla [Sugar beet], 5, 30-32.
19. Sapronov, N. M., Kosulin, G. S., Tsukanov, V. N., Bashkardina, E. V, Krasnopivtseva, I. N. & Posashkov, P. A. (2008). Zashchita sakharnoi svekly ot tserkosporoza [Protection of sugar beet from Cercospora]. Sakharnaya svekla [Sugar beet], 5, 36-38.
20. Shamin, A. A. (2015). Formirovanie kompleksa pochvennoi i rizosfernoi fi-topatogennoi mikobioty v agrotsenoze sakharnoi svekly v TsChR (Avtoref. diss. na soisk. uch. step. kand. s.-kh. nauk) [Forming of complex of soil and rhizospheric phytopatogenic mycobiota in agrocenosis of sugar beet in CBR (Unpublished master's thesis)]. Moscow: Federal'nyi nauchnyi tsentr ovoshchevodstva.
21. Shpaar, D., Dreger, D. & Zakharenko, A. (2012). Sakharnaya svekla (Vyrashchivanie, uborka i khranenie) [Sugar beet (Growing, harvesting, storage)]. Moscow: ID OOO «DLV AGRODELO».
22. Slavyanskii, A. A., Vovk, G. A. & Zhigalov, M. S. (2006). Laboratornyi praktikum po metodam issledovanii svoistv syr'ya i produktov pitaniya [Laboratory practical work of methods to study characteristics of row material and food]. Moscow: Izdatel'skii kompleks MGUPP.
23. Stognienko, O. I. (2008). Vredonosnost' tserkosporoza sakharnoi svekly v usloviyakh Voronezhskoi oblasti [Damage of Cercospora of sugar beet in the conditions of Voronezh region]. Sakharnaya svekla [Sugar beet], 6, 24-25.
24. Stognienko, O. I. (2016). Kak provesti polnyi kompleks fungitsidnykh obrabotok v posevakh sakharnoi svekly, sniziv zatraty i pestitsidnuyu nagruzku [How to conduct a full range of fungicide treatments in crops of sugar beet reducing costs and pesticide load]. Sakharnaya svekla [Sugar beet], 2, 36-37.
25. Tatur, I. N., Luk"yanyuk, N. A. & Benduzan, O. P. (2003). Tserkosporoz v posevakh sakharnoi svekly [Cercospora on the sugar beet]. Seibit, 2, 20-22.
26. Zubenko, V. F. (1988). Metodika issledovanii sakharnoi svekly [Methodology of testing of sugar beet]. Kiev: VNIS.
Review
For citations:
Putilina L.N., Lazutina N.A. Forming of Technological Quality and Productivity of Sugar Beet as a Result of Action of Modern Fungicides. Storage and Processing of Farm Products. 2021;(1). (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36107/spfp.2021.184
Views:
599
Email this article 