The Role of Data Repositories and Issues of Ethical Use
https://doi.org/10.36107/spfp.2021.209
Abstract
Repositories are becoming an indispensable element for scientific schools and institutes, because they fulfill and expand the functions of digital libraries, and institutes see the benefits of forming electronic archives. Of particular value are the so-called raw (raw) research data. Repositories provide opportunities for downloading, sharing, distributing and using each other's research (field) data. A growing body of evidence suggests that the publication of research data is just as important as the publication of the research itself. In addition to placement in open repositories, the publication of research (raw) data is also possible as an independent type of publication - data paper. This article analyzes the aspects that facilitate and hinder the dissemination of data, among them the lack of information about this type of publication, the lack of previous experience in sharing or reusing data. There are factors that can facilitate or hinder the open exchange of data through repositories. Issues and issues regarding the sharing of research data are discussed in addition to the potential benefits. Data exchange is very important for the development of science and the popularity of such publications is growing. Quoting is an ethical and copyright tool.
About the Authors
Elena V. Tikhonova
Moscow State University of Food Production
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Наталия Шленская
ФГБОУ ВО "Московский государственный университет пищевых производств"
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Зельдина, М. М. (2019). Политика обмена исследовательскими данными. М.: ООО «Ваше цифровое издательство». https://doi.org/10.24108/978-5-6040408-7-4
2. Земсков, А. И. (2016). Открытый доступ и открытые архивы информации. Научные и технические библиотеки, 6, 41-61. https://www.gpntb.ru/ntb/ntb/2016/6/NTB6_2016_%D0%905_3.pdf
3. Чадин, И. (2018). Zenodo и GBIF: инструменты для публикации наборов первичных данных. Вестник Института биологии Коми НЦ УрО РАН, 3, 34-36. https://doi.org/10.31140/j.vestnikib.2018.3(205).5
4. Aleixandre-Benavent, R.,Vidal-Infer, A., Alonso-Arroyo, A., Peset, F., & Sapena, A. F. (2020). Research data sharing in spain: Exploring determinants, practices, and perceptions. MDPI, 5(2), 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/data5020029
5. Aranda, M. A. G. (2018). Sharing powder diffraction raw data: Challenges and benefits. Journal of Applied Crystallography, 51(6), 1739-1744. https://doi.org/10.1107/S160057671801556X
6. Barba, A., Dominguez, S., Cobas, C., Martinsen, D. P., Romain, C., Rzepa, H. S., & Seoane, F. (2019). Workflows Allowing Creation of Journal Article Supporting Information and Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR)-Enabled Publication of Spectroscopic Data. ACS Omega, 4(2), 3280-3286. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b03005
7. Bull, S., Roberts, N., & Parker, M. (2015). Views of Ethical Best Practices in Sharing Individual-Level Data From Medical and Public Health Research: A Systematic Scoping Review. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics: JERHRE, 10(3), 225-238. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264615594767
8. Castellani, J. (2013). Are clinical trial data shared sufficiently today? Yes. British Medical Journal, 347(7916), f1881. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f1881
9. Draxl, C., & Scheffler, M. (2019). The NOMAD laboratory: From data sharing to artificial intelligence. JPhys Materials, 2(3), 036001. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7639/ab13bb
10. Gabelica, M., Cavar, J., & Puljak L. (2019) Authors of trials from high-ranking anesthesiology journals were not willing to share raw data. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 109, 111-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.01.012
11. Habibzadeh, F. (2017). Statistical Data Editing in Scientific Articles. Journal of Korean medical science, 32(7), 1072-1076. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2017.32.7.1072
12. Hrynaszkiewicz, I., Norton, M. L., Vickers, A. J., & Altman, D. G. (2010). Preparing raw clinical data for publication: guidance for journal editors, authors, and peer reviewers. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 340, с181. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c181
13. Lichtfouse, E. (2018) Publishing science without results and recycling research. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 16, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-017-0690-7
14. Liu, Y.-N., Wang, Y.-P., Wang, X.-F., Xia, Z., & Xu, J.-F. (2019) Privacy-preserving raw data collection without a trusted authority for IoT. Computer Networks, 148, 340-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2018.11.028
15. Manju, R., & Buckley, B. S. (2012). Systematic archiving and access to health research data: Rationale, current status and way forward. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 90, 932-939. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.12.105908
16. Parker, M., & Bull, S. (2015). Sharing public health research data: Towards the development of ethical data-sharing practice in low- and middle-income settings. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 10(3), 217-224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264615593494
17. Piwowar, H. A. (2011). Who shares? Who doesn't? Factors associated with openly archiving raw research data. PloS One, 6(7), e18657. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018657
18. Stieglitz, S., Wilms, K., Mirbabaie, M., Hofeditz, L., Brenger, B., Lopez, A., & Rehwald, S. (2020). When are researchers willing to share their data? – Impacts of values and uncertainty on open data in academia. PLoS One, 15(7), e0234172. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234172
19. Vidal-Infer, A., Aleixandre-Benavent, R., Lucas-Dominguez, R., & Sixto-Costoya, A. (2019). The availability of raw data in substance abuse scientific journals, Journal of Substance, 24(1), 36-402. https://doi.org/10.1080/14659891.2018.1489905
20.
Review
For citations:
Tikhonova E.V., The Role of Data Repositories and Issues of Ethical Use. Storage and Processing of Farm Products. 2021;(2):8-14. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36107/spfp.2021.209
Views:
427
Email this article 