Seed and Food Potato Variety Characteristic Ifluence on Quantitative Loss During Storage Period
https://doi.org/10.36107/spfp.2021.226
Abstract
Post-harvest quality management of potato tubers is aimed at extending the dormancy period and reducing losses. The objects of research were potato tubers of varieties Zekura, Gala, Red Scarlet, Rosara and Nevsky. Test setting and quantitative storage losses were determined by the method of K.A. Pshechenkov et al (2002) by taking into account the loss in mass (natural loss) and absolute waste. The loss in mass was determined by weighing the fixed meshes. When storing a batch of seed potatoes in the amount of 1500 tons, the natural loss in weight on average for varieties was 7.4% and the absolute waste was 4.0%. The mass loss did not exceed the approved normative norms of 7.3%. The absolute decay due to rot was also negligible. We associate the good preservation of tubers with the treatment the tubers of seed potatoes before laying for storage with the Prestige fungicide with a consumption rate of 0.7-1.0 l/t and observing the storage regime. During storage of food potatoes, losses due to natural loss and absolute waste were higher by 4.2% and 1.7% compared to losses of seed potatoes. The maximum total loss of potatoes under one storage regime was 19% for the varieties Rosara and Red Scarlet, the minimum for the variety Gala - 15%. The varieties Zekura and Nevsky are well preserved. Their losses over 9 months of storage were 15.7% and 16%, respectively.
About the Authors
Tatiana B. ShaidulinaRussian Federation
Ekaterina Petrovna Kondratenko
Russian Federation
Olga Mikhailovna Soboleva
Russian Federation
Oksana Alekseevna Sartakova
Russian Federation
Larisa Anatolyevna Filipovich
Russian Federation
Tatiana Aleksandrovna Miroshina
Russian Federation
References
1. Gross harvests of crops in the Russian Federation in 2019, Part 1. / Federal State Statistics Service. Moscow, 2020. [Electronic resource]. URL: https: //www.gks.ru/compendium/document/13277.
2. Dospekhov B.A. Field experiment technique: (with the basics of statistical processing of research results): a textbook for students of higher agricultural educational institutions in agronomic specialties / B. A. Dospekhov. - Ed. 6th, reprinted from the 5th ed. 1985 - Moscow: Alliance, 2011 . - 350 p.
3. Fedotova L.S., Timoshina N.A., Knyazeva E.V. Dynamics of potato biochemical parameters during storage // Potatoes and vegetables - 2017. - No. 1. - P. 31-34.
4. Pshechenkov K.A., Maltsev S.V. Methodical recommendations for storage technology of various varieties of potatoes. M .: All-Russian Research Institute of Potato Farming, 2010. – 30 p.
5. Pshechenkov K.A., Davydenkova O.N. Consumer qualities of tubers and potato storage depending on the variety, growing conditions and storage: Aspects of potato growing / Scientific. works. - M., 2003. - P. 90-99.
6. Pshechenkov K.A., Zeyruk V.N., Elanskiy S.N., Maltsev S.V., Pryamov S.B. Potato storage. - M.: Agrospas, 2016. - 144p.
7. Pshechenkov K.A., Maltsev S.V., Zeyruk V.N., Sazonova Z.V., Klyuev S.I. Modern technologies for storing potatoes. Cheboksary: VNIIKKH, 2017. 23 p.
8. Lyubimova A., Eremin D. Laboratory varietal control as a guarantee of successful work of agribusiness in Russia // MATEC Web of Conferences. – EDP Sciences, 2018. Т. 170. P. 04015. DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201817004015.
9. Maltsev S.V., Abrosimov D.V., Abashkin O.V. Storage of seed potato using chemical and physical methods of exposure to tubers // Potato and vegetables. - 2019. - No. 5. - P. 31-34.
10. Niu S. et al. Starch granule sizes and degradation in sweet potatoes during storage //Postharvest Biology and Technology. – 2019. – Т. 150. – С. 137-147.
11. Olsen N., Kleinkopf G. Storage Management //Potato Production Systems. – Springer, Cham, 2020. – С. 523-545.
12. Pobereżny J. et al. Effect of Potato Storage and Reconditioning Parameters on Physico–Chemical Characteristics of Isolated Starch //Starch‐Stärke. – 2021. – Т. 73. – №. 1-2. – С. 2000019.
13. Organizational mechanism for the formation and development of the seed potato market in the countries of the EAEU Commonwealth / V.I. Nechaev, S.L. Pisarev, L.V. Pisareva. // Agroindustrial complex: Economics, Management. 2018. No. 10. P. 106-111.
14. Potatoes: problems and prospects / Zhevora S.V., Anisimov B.V., Simakov E.A., Oves E.V., Zebrin S.N. // Potatoes and vegetables. 2019. No. 7. P. 2-7. DOI: 10.25630 / PAV.2019.89.92.006.
15. Donors of potato (Solanum L.) plasticity and yield stability traits in the environmental conditions of north forest steppe of Western Siberia / V.N. Pakul, N.A. Lapshinov, A.N. Gantimurova, V.I. Kulikova // Sel’skokhozyaistvennaya Biologiya [Agricultural Biology]. 2019. Vol. 54, №5. P. 978-989. DOI: 10.15389/agrobiology.2019.5.978eng.
16. Efficiency of potato production: analysis of variation and differentiation of regions of the Russian Federation / V. Osipov et al // IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 2019. 274 012060. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/274/1/012060.
17. Assuring potato tuber quality during storage: A future perspective / Alamar M. C. et al. // Frontiers in Plant Science. 2017. Т. 8. Р. 2034. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.02034.
18. Preparation and thermal properties of shape-stabilized composite phase change materials based on polyethylene glycol and porous carbon prepared from potato / Yin Z. et al. // RSC Adv. 6. Р. 15821-15830. DOI: 10.1039/C5RA25685B.
19. Acrylamide in potato crisps prepared from 20 UK-grown varieties: effects of variety and tuber storage time / Elmore J. E., Briddon A., Dodson A. T., Muttucumaru N., Halford N. G., Mottram D. S. // Food Chem. 2016. 182. Р. 1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.02.
20. Goyer A. et al. Effect of low‐temperature storage on the content of folate, vitamin B6, ascorbic acid, chlorogenic acid, tyrosine, and phenylalanine in potatoes //Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. – 2019. – Т. 99. – №. 10. – С. 4842-4848.
21. Kedia P., Kausley S. B., Rai B. Temperature and humidity based models for the prediction of transpiration rate in potatoes during storage //Journal of Food Process Engineering. – 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpe.13626
22. Zhang L. et al. Inhibiting Sprouting and Decreasing α-Solanine Amount of Stored Potatoes Using Hydrophobic Nanosilica //ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. – 2018. – Т. 6. – №. 8. – С. 10517-10525.
23. Zeyruk V.N., Maltsev S.V., Vasilieva S., Byzov V. Modern production factors that determine the biological and economic efficiency of potato storage // Storage and processing of agricultural raw materials. - 2019. - No. 3. - P. 20-28.
24. Valencia-Flórez L. et al. Influence of storage conditions on the quality of two varieties of native potato (Solanum Tuberosum group phureja) //Dyna. – 2019. – Т. 86. – №. 209. – С. 49-55.
Review
For citations:
Shaidulina T.B., Kondratenko E.P., Soboleva O.M., Sartakova O.A., Filipovich L.A., Miroshina T.A. Seed and Food Potato Variety Characteristic Ifluence on Quantitative Loss During Storage Period. Storage and Processing of Farm Products. 2021;(2):27-37. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36107/spfp.2021.226